I don't like it because the two of you end up acting like babies.
Stephen, really! I never insult others unless they insult me first. I am much more of a gentleman than Steve Sammet!
Well, how about this thread and actually calling Ted a fraud etc, without provocation from Ted. What about the previous thread where you attacked Ted with the same vengeance. here are some examples of Ethan's conduct.
Fraudulent. Outright lies.
I am 100 percent certain his data is falsified.
falsified involves intent. And no proof is offered. See post #76115
I dare him to even try because in the end he will be shown for the lying charlatan he is.
Again accusing Ted's personal character and willful intent but no proof offered.
But he can't because he's not telling the truth
Ethan accuses Ted of lying, but no proof provided.
See the pattern is for Ethan to accuse direct competitors like Ted, and others like me without proof. Is that being a gentleman. Don't think so. And Ted never fired the first Volley and took the insults. What a shame. Got to feel for Ted.
In the other "bigger issue" thread, Steve Sammet yet again accuses me of "Ethan has been caught deceiving people" as he always does. I challenged him to either show proof or STFU and apologize to me. I am a highly respected regular contributor at the AVS forum. I challenge SAS to show otherwise.
Hyping yourself are you. Are you stating you did not make false statements on AVS forum? Time to fess up Ethan.
You have already dodged the question once. Going to try for twice. If you have and you dodge the question, then you lied and proved my point.
I suggest you watch that "bigger issue" thread closely, and see if SAS is able to back up his claims. If he can't, then you'll know for sure who's the baby and who is credible. And I hope you too will tell him to STFU and grow up.
Are you again stating you made no false statements on AVS or simply dodging the question? Time to fess up as you know you did. You certainly attacked Ted without provocation. Now the spot light is on you. So you going to do the two step again Ethan. I am going to give you some time to see if you fess up, or continue to lie. Everytime you dodge the question, you commit a lie and prove my point. You also show the public how insincere you are to them.
Here Ethan argues with JA because Ethan refuses to post his affiliation to realtraps, as the rules require.
Everyone here knows that I own RealTraps, a prominent manufacturer of high performance acoustic treatment products. Real acoustic treatment products that actually work, and are proven to work using real science as shown all over the RealTraps web site. And anyone who doesn't know who I am can find out in 3 seconds on Google.
If that were true and everyone knows you, then why not post your affiliation? It is the rules so what is the problem. If he treats JA like this, imagine how he will treat you. So more evidence provided behind his facade.
It also gives Ethan to pop in an advertisement which is also against the rules. So much for Ethan's ethical and honest conduct.
But I'm not here as a representative of RealTraps. I am here as Scienceman,
Of course JA pointed out:
It is fair to point out that, by your own admission, you have no education or training in the sciences, which is presumably why you don't comprehend the benefits of correctly performed dither, as demonstrated in your AES presentation 2 weeks ago.)
So Ethan claims he is "science man" posting a superman symbol written as scienceman. Yet he couldn't compare simple graphs as both JA and I had to correct him.
And Ethan attempts multiple times to compare tennis balls to metallic objects which obviously have different characteristics. So Ethan proves JA's comment, although Ethan hypes himself. More evidence of deception.
Pretty amazing how Ethan is quick to argue, accuse, and attack everyone without provocation, but if we react, we are not a gentleman like Ethan.
Anyway, balls in your court Ethan. Let's see if you can be honest this time or whether you play dodgeball and sidestep or whatever other tatic he may want.