>>> "The proof is in her own words over many many posts here on AA. Tell you what I've got a thousand dollars that says I'm right and that the Belts have neither done any meaningful scientific investigations into either their "concept" or the possibility that bias effects are at work. Do you want to take that bet? I'm serious, I'll put up a thousand bucks..........
Yep. It was true then and it is true now. I still have a thousand bucks that says so. Any takers?
They say a fool and his money are soon parted. And given all the rabid squawking I've seen coming from you in this thread, I'm surprised you even have $1,000 left. Should I believe that? I mean, when you say "I'm serious", I sure hope that doesn't mean "I'm serious when I say that I'm talking out of my butt again, and as always, I have no plans of backing up anything I say"? I say that, because we've seen Ethan do a lot of these phony, baloney "bravado bets" here, with money he doesn't have, or ever plans to pay out. And you have already started on shaky ground, by editing this one line of yours. So if this "bet thing" isn't just you squawking again mindlessly, then yeah Scott, I'll gladly take that bet. I'll take payment in the form of a cashier's check, for $1,000 US, thank you.
I can provide evidence that would refute that exact claim of yours above. So don't be goin' all James Randi on me either, whereby you reject any evidence that would cause you to lose $1,000 dollars, and game the bet. I know that trick, along with all the rhetorical manipulations you use to try to save face in debates. I will disprove what you've written above, not the conditions you hope to add after the fact, to save face and a G-note. Let's work out the details of how you're going to pay me, before I get to it.