Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification | Digital Sources Analog Sources Featured | Accessories Music |
Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification Digital Sources | Analog Sources Accessories Featured | Music Columns Retired Columns | Show Reports | Features Latest News Community | Resources Subscriptions |
You aren't going to outperform two Adcom amps for $800. The only companies that have amps in those price ranges that aren't commercial like Crown are Emotiva and Outlaw. I would take Adcom over either and Crown will fall well short of all three in detail and performance.
You might find a vintage unit from Krell, Mark Levinson or a McIntosh solid state in that range. The risk is that if you buy a 20 or 30 year old amp, you are going to need to get it refurbished which could easily double your price, maybe more.
IMO bi-amping will improve the sound very little or not at all. The sound quality of those Adcom amps is fair, but not all that good.
If you can afford it the Vincent SP-331 will be a major sonic improvement, for $1399.
Instead of vertical bi-amp, you would get significant sonic and detail, stereo separation, and POWER if you placed each Adcom amp in bridged mode, then run one amp per speaker in dual-mono mode.
Not sure how much power your speakers need, but I'm certain that architecture will give you an advantage.
Cheers,
Ron
Are you saying, commsysman, that two amps in vertical bi-amp mode will hardly-if-at-all outperform one amp in stereo mode?
rrstesiak - What is to be said, however, regarding the safety, for my speakers and my ampS, of running dual-mono?