Fried Compact 7 loudspeaker Second Samples December 2008
In my October column, I "non-recommended" Fried Products Corporation's Compact 7 loudspeaker ($1795/pair) because of an obvious hollow-clapping coloration in the pair the manufacturer submitted for evaluation. John Atkinson's measurements (October, pp.184185) confirmed what I had heard: the frequency-response graph of the original samples of the Compact 7 is the worst-looking I can remember in more than 30 years of reading Stereophile.
I expect that controversialists may have second-guessed my decision, once I heard that coloration, not to immediately halt the review process and contact Fried. (I write this before the October issue has been published and any reader comments received.) There were two reasons I went forward with the review. First, the two Compact 7s sounded (and measured) identically, so I ruled out shipping damage. Second, a statement on Fried's website"Loudspeaker design and performance has little to do with producing a flat frequency response"indicated to me that what I was hearing was intentional. The sound wasn't flat-out horrible, just sufficiently flawed to be uncompetitive. I also, later, thought that if the speaker were to be measured either from farther away or on a different axis, the midrange cancellation might not look so bad on a graph.
Fried Products responded to the preprint of my column by suggesting first that the woofer and tweeter were internally miswired with respect to each other, and then that the wrong crossover might have been used. Fried says they were changing over from a (yellow) woven-fiber woofer to a (black) treated-paper woofer, and an old pair of completed speakers from inventory had been retrofitted, but, as it turned out, with both woofers of the pair connected in incorrect polarity. The resultant acoustical cancellation in the crossover region caused the extensive midrange trough visible in the frequency-response graph.
JA agreed to measure another pair of Fried Compact 7s, and I agreed to listen to them. He and I thought it best that I not see the new measurementssee Follow-Up in this issueuntil I had filed my column. The new speakers were indeed new, not rebuilds of the first samples, and were clad in handsome bookmatched maple veneer with a clear gloss finish. (See my October column for a refresher on the nuts and bolts of the Compact 7.)
I started listening with Carat's I57 CD receiver, Cardas Neutral Reference speaker cables, and a GutWire B-16 power cord. The Compact 7s were positioned 28" above the floor, as recommended by Fried, with their grilles off.
The first CD I put on was Attention Screen's Live at Merkin Hall (CD, Stereophile STPH018-2). There was quite a contrast to the aggressive sound of the GINI LS3/5as: the Frieds were quite smootha bit too smooth for my tastebut at least the hand claps at the end of "Mansour's Gift" sounded sincere rather than hollow, I then put on Anthony Newman and the Graham Ashton Ensemble's Music for Organ, Brass and Timpani (SACD/CD, Sonoma SAC 001), which sounded a bit veiled, and with the tail of the hall acoustic cut off a bit prematurely.
I then put on a new discovery, the John Coltrane Quartet's Ballads, from 1962 (CD, Impulse! GRD 156). If Coltrane's reputation as an "angry tenor" blowing out "sheets of sound" has kept you away, this gentle, quiet collection might rope you in. The other players are McCoy Tyner on piano, Elvin Jones on drums, and Jimmy Garrison on bass (except for Reggie Workman on "It's Easy to Remember"). The original sessions, produced by Bob Thiele, were recorded by Rudy van Gelder at his studio in New Jersey. The only thing not to be entranced by is the 32-minute running time. But this recording is not to be missed.
Coltrane's Ballads was more the Fried's cup of tea, but by this time I was thinking that the sound was entirely too tailored and polite, so I sent the Carat I57 back to the on-deck circle and started over again from the beginning with the Arcam Solo Mini. More about which later, but my preliminary impression is that while the Solo Mini's sound has a strong family resemblance to that of the full-sized Arcam Solo Music, I prefer the Mini by a nose, at least within its power limitations. Its sound is just slightly more tactile. The only practical thing so far that is less than ducky is that the Mini's speaker terminals are quite small, and don't accept spade lugs.
Ah, much better! The percussion on Live at Merkin Hall was finally showing a bit of sparkle. On the first few tracks of Test CD 2, the Fried now sounded at least in the ballpark of respectable and recommendable speakers. The electric bass had both snap and sustain, and RL's speaking voice was natural, with only the touch of sibilance that I think is on the recording. Even better, the differences between the in- and out-of-phase speaking voices and bass tracks were close to the greatest I have ever heardalways a promise of good things to come.
The only thing that raised an eyebrow during my preliminary listening was that the character of the pink noise on track 15 of Test CD 2 changed dramatically when, after standing at the listening position, I sat down. (However, the higher- and lower-frequency components of the pink noise no longer seemed to be coming from different sources.) A quick listen to the Tallis Scholars' new recording of Allegri's Miserere (CD, Gimell CDGIM 041) produced the same effect: heard from standing up, the timbres were veiled, the soundstage radically foreshortened; when I sat down, all clicked into focus and sounded very nice indeed. I could get halfway excited about this. I next put on Jackson Browne's Late for the Sky (CD, Elektra) and found myself singing harmony on "Fountain of Sorrow"always a good sign. The cymbal on Jim Hall's Concierto was now in its proper perspective.
I then used, as a torture test, organist James Busby's performance of Herbert Howells' Master Tallis's Testament, from Pipes Rhode Island (CD, Riago 101), in which a 32Hz pedal tone is backed up by a 16Hz suboctave pipe. Nice, as far as it went, which was somewhat short of doing full justice to that 32Hz low C. I ended with cuts from Anna Netrebko and Danielle de Niese. Again, nice, but not as transparent and extended as I have ever heard.
I think that there are more refined and extended tweeters out thereat a priceand Fried must agree with me: their more expensive models have different tweeters. I also think that the Compact 7's woofer is too large to do complete justice to the midrange. However, what your incremental dollars buy you over the three-way, $1090/pair Renaissance Audio MLP-403.5 that I wrote about in August 2008 is not only better industrial design and fit'n'finish, but a more coherent sound. And while the Renaissance's bigger woofer might give you more bass extension, the Compact 7's bass is faster and punchier.
Fried's Compact 7 is handsome and well made. Furthermore, when the right crossover is properly connected to the woofer and the tweeter, it has a very respectable sound that I can get enthusiastic about, though by no means insanely enthusiastic.
The obvious comparison is with Harbeth's HL-3PES-2, which costs only $55 more per pair. It's a straightforward tradeoff of sonic quality for sonic quantity: The Harbeth nails the midrange and treble in a way the Fried does not, but the Fried produces a bigger sound, and does dynamics and bass better (footnote 1).
If you were to splash out on an Arcam Solo Mini, the Fried Compact 7s, some speaker cables, and some tallish stands, then, for an outlay of about $3500, you'd have an attractive system that should give lots of pleasure with minimal fuss. By "attractive," I mean a decisive step up in sound quality from a den/library/dorm room-type "second" system. But the search will continue!John Marks
Footnote 1: After writing this column, and at the risk of opening up another can of wormsand I sure don't want to do thatI swapped the Fried Compact 7s left to right and turned them upside down so that the tweeters were above the woofers. The result was pretty much a one-to-one tradeoff. The treble was now more prominent, but less well integrated with the midrange. If I had to live with these speakers forever, I'd probably want stands taller than 28", and I'd experiment more extensively with associated equipment and speaker cables.John Marks