Audiophile : Someone who takes the care to appreciate all that encompasses music. Time is spent on understanding the intricacies of the listening process, the equipment, and the music form to optimize listening pleasure and beauty.
Define the word "audiophile."

- Login or register to post comments

The word "audiophile" was not sourced from the word "music". While a love of music is shared by many of us, a quick perusal of Audio Asylum reveals that the love (or disdain, if a component falls short) of the equipment that reproduces music is what we actually have in common. For me, better perhaps than Sam Tellig's "melomane", the word "stereophile" nicely segues between the music and the music box; "stereo" still implies the epiphany of hearing reproduced music expand beyond the parameters of the everyday world.

An audiophile is a motivated music lover who is able to compare audio reproductions with the sensations of live performances, and make informed technical choices for improving the experience of reproduced music. It follows then that an *ideal* audiophile hears live music regularly and has at least a rudimentary familiarity with the major findings of psychoacoustics and their applications to music recording and reproduction, similarly classical physics, analog electronics, digital signal processing, commonly used signaling and data transmission protocols, and information theory. With the aid of other audiophiles like him or herself, such a person can arrange to have the best experience he or she can afford, make satisfying equipment choices without regrets, forestall premature obsolescence, and achieve balanced performance that gives up nothing essential at any step along the complete signal processing chain from the human artist to the human ear. Alternatively, an audiophile may be in some respects a bit more like a drunk who wanders aimlessly from one illusion to the next.

Why complicate things. Audiophile means "love to hear" (usually music). So I am an audiophile because I love to hear music the way it was intended to be heard (live or studio). How subjective is that? It's all subjective! Which is why I don't need a $5000 cable on my system, but I am not satisfied with an iPod either.

Someone who really, really enjoys the 10-year old reviews of equipment from manufacturers who are no in business, which seem to make up at least half the material on www.stereophile.com.

I think it has more to do with the appreciation of sonic quality as opposed to your expenditures. A true audiophile appreciates the value of good sound, whether their speakers were $200/pair like the Audioengine A2s, or $100,000. I'd venture so far as to say that true audiophiles don't spend at the highest ceilings for their products, rather those are targeted at people with too much disposable income, who need to be validated by their material belongings.

An audiophile has to love seriously listening to music. However, there is also the constant thought that one is never satisfied with their system; there is always that cable, amp or speaker that would lift another veil and one would then hear more of the detail of the recording. (To that end, it could be a mental condition.) Many audiophiles, by their nature, are very sensitive to both beautiful sounds as pleasurable and irritating sounds as painful and disturbing.
- All Headphones Ship Free!
Shop a Huge Selection of Top Quality
Headphones at Great Prices!
www.Headphones.com
| Loudspeakers Amplification Digital Sources | Analog Sources Accessories Featured | Music Columns Features | Show Reports | Show Reports |
Recommended Components Blogs Latest News Community |
Shop Resources Subscriptions |


