Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification | Digital Sources Analog Sources Featured | Accessories Music |
Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification Digital Sources | Analog Sources Accessories Featured | Music Columns Retired Columns | Show Reports | Features Latest News Community | Resources Subscriptions |
It's a pretty decent thought, actually. There's certainly a lot of overlap, just as there is between car buffs and audiophiles.
I don't have time to do any serious coding anymore. I can barely find the time to keep my Linux box updated. (One linux box, a couple of macs, and a PC laptop that belongs to my wife which she won't let me install linux on)
Linux, didn't help form the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, which is gonna cure some of the world's ills? So maybe free ware is worth every penny ya paid for it? But I do use FireFox and it's terrific, but they formed out of a commerical venture Netscape (Mozillz?) Never use dLinux, don't have any desire to. And how is RedHat stock doing anyway? Why not freeware for energy and freeware for food, hey, everything let's go teh Linux route, do you think the amazing antibiotics and medicines would have been discovered if not for the evil PROFIT motive, and patents and licensing? Linux is like socialized software? But taht eventually tumbles, everyone doesn't improve or progress, no motivation.
Easy, dude. I'm a Libertarian. I like capitalism (I know, gasp!). And I think open source software has a legitimate place in the market, and I think things just work better that way. I never suggested that its development should be subsidized, etc. (unless you think taking profits away from MS is inherently a subsidy - in which case you're being anti-free market). And I don't think the government should make software be free. I think people should choose open source software (like firefox) over the alternative. Yep, people still make money.
And the Gates' foundation argument is truly ridiculous. So Steve Jobs is bad because he took market share from Microsoft as well?
Anyhow, your assumptions (especially the implicit assumptions about me) are unfounded. Besides, you didn't even have to take it that direction (i.e. away from my innocuous statements).
EDIT: And, of course, I love profit motives. Companies are often the originators of open source software. There is, of course, nothing wrong with that at all. I think it makes perfect sense, and often makes them money.
I think you're right on pretty much most of those accounts. I come from a design and creative background, leaning into some engineering and liberally dosed with a strong DIY attitude. In fact I sort of secretly hate it when there's nothing I can do to improve a component! Many, although not all, audiophiles just dig getting in there and tinkering, tweaking, figuring out not just HOW to make it sound great, but WHY it does.
I've seen some "gear collectors"- the guys that need to constantly upgrade and trade in, but they aren't very interesting guys I'm afraid, and never seem to enjoy the music much... In the end it still has to be about the music, which is why despite what I just said about loving to tinker, I stop thinking about my system and just settle in. This will be for quite a while (years) before I start thinking of upgrades or whatever.
And DUP's response is an almost classic Hacker rant in that he seems to hate anyone else giving him the Truth, let alone suggesting he's part of some "group." Rarely will you come across a more libertarian curmudgeon, excepting maybe a farmer in New Hampshire.
Unfortunately there is nothing libertarian about DUP.
Libertarianism puts a premium on individual liberty.
DUP is an authoritarian and views himself as teh sole authority.
(The hacker/audiophile simile is quite appropos.)
Definitely a good point on balancing tinkering and inquiry with contentment. Just like some hackers rarely actually use their computers to do anything (I would argue they are worse off for it).
This also brings to mind Digital Rights Management, and the love-hate relationship its impetus has for vinyl. People don't generally "rip" vinyl and share it -- it defeats the purpose. I don't like DRM because I like to own what I buy - not rent it, or own it only at the whim of some third party. You can't put "digital" rights management on vinyl .
You have the same DRM on vinyl as you do on a DRM protected file: You can copy it via its analog outputs.
Very true- I don't want to bring back cassettes, but back in the day it really was pretty fun making friends mix tapes! But back then the whole point was sharing the MUSIC, not sharing your "files." F!@** sharing your files! There's nothing fun or music loving about it! It's just "collecting" pure and simple.
How many people did you know during Napster's heyday who'd proudly tell you how many MP3s they had- or how many Gigs of MP3 files. That's nothing like sharing your music with friends.
Recording in real time off of records took time and care to make something good for your friends- possibly all afternoon to get just the right song order. It was for people who truly loved hanging out and sharing new music- exactly the spirit of what many of us are digging from Stephen's blog.
You can still do that with file sharing. Just copy your CDs for your friends using 1x write speed. That will record the copy disk in real time. The choices are there for you.
"You can still do that with file sharing. Just copy your CDs for your friends using 1x write speed. That will record the copy disk in real time. The choices are there for you."
Heheh- good one dude.