I have a different take. Republicans (some) and Democrats (most) are screwing up the Country. I don't see where 'Conservatives' are screwing up the Country.

I wouldn't group them by class.  This isn't a class struggle that is ruining your country.  Anyway, what exactly are your talking about?  The $5 Bank of America is going to charge for using their debit card?  I see they are rioting in NYC over this.  What a joke.  Just get their credit card.

She just told me to take a Levitra.  She has done this before and fooled me.  She can be cruel.

Lamont Sanford wrote:

She just told me to take a Levitra.  She has done this before and fooled me.  She can be cruel.

Do you mean that you have had to take 'matters' into your own hands in the past?

I hate it when that happens.

" whats worse than a Liberal " Two Liberal's .

ArthurPE wrote:

they have no class?

fixed: so both classless assholes are screwing up my Counrty

What do you mean by "no class?"

Can you give me an example?

Thanks,

Mark

I bet the moderators see that the Class Man is somewhere in French Canada. 

ArthurPE wrote:

n!&&erhead

booing a soldier on his 3rd combat tour

weenergate

rangel

 

 

 

 

While I do not condone the use of the first description using the "N" word, I do agree that you have three good points thereafter.

Incidently, Code Pink, an organization founded by the ultra-liberal Cindy Sheehan and her minions, made it a point to boo soldiers, spit on soldiers, and print up hateful, vicious signs against our men in uniform.

Examples of Code Pink: And these are shocking! Please check them out.

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.targetofopportunity.com/liberals_hate_troops.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.targetofopportunity.com/codepink.htm&usg=__3T-oRBmcoVAfsCHVc1xAb8Hag1o=&h=390&w=520&sz=50&hl=en&start=547&sig2=jWKSBknF6bCQwI_I4vEILg&zoom=1&tbnid=mVqu89gebtGAZM:&tbnh=98&tbnw=131&ei=VMeITvrLCIW4tgfH6NQ1&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dberkeley%2Bliberals%26start%3D546%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26tbm%3Disch&um=1&itbs=1

Anthony Weiner (Weinergate) was a left-wing Progressive Democrat representing Chuck Schumers old district in NY.

Charlie Rangel, House Ways and Means Chairman and ranking member of the Congressional Black Caucus, and Democrat representative of N.Y. is another far left Progressive liberal.

All are liberal Democrats.

However, I still don't see how Conservatives play into the scenario.

Thanks,

Mark

Okay, anyone can look into the booing of the gay soldier.  It was in Orange County County Convention Center (large open auditorium in Florida).  Audience was 5,500+.  Approx. three people booed.  The following week the president during a question and answer replied, "You’ve got audiences cheering at the prospect of somebody dying because they don’t have healthcare and booing a service member in Iraq because they’re gay. That’s not reflective of who we are."  I'm assuming you are embracing the cult of personality perspective?  That would be the distorted latter view in case you are confused.  But one could even fathom that the gay issue is a non-issue by the mere fact that in a Republican debate only three people openly booed a gay soldier.  Who cares that he served three tours overseas.  Some people have served more than three tours and all they did was collect trash.  The gay soldier openly stated that he wasn't "serving" his country but was more exact in stating he didn't want to lose "his job". 

It appears you are taking isolated and occasional human behavior you don't condone and comparing up to a national level debate.  You should learn our language.  We don't use the "N" word and call it something else.  In fact, the "N" word isn't part of this forum's language.  You're on the wrong forum.  You need to find yourself a nice quite Canadian forum where you can use the "N" word.  Shouldn't be hard to find at all.

I think ST pretty much summed up the rest of my thoughts on your stupidity. 

If you really want to help the USA find a way to lower the over 30 thousand automobile related deaths each year.  Since the War on Terror over 321,000 people have been killed on U.S. highways.  Compare that to the 6,000 killed participating in the War on Terror.  Why aren't you attacking the Department of Transportation, the automobile industry, and so forth.  Why are you trying to start a bunch of shit over a few people booing a gay soldier at a Republican debate where nobody interfered with his constitutional right of freedom of speech.  Even the booing was an exercise in that same right.   It is like attacking all liberals because a few are bent on getting convicted rapists out of prison.  You really should get your priorities in order before tackling such complex issues concerning the United States.  Don't worry, we will keep our promise to keep your families safe in time of Canadian national security.  After all, we have been keeping this promise since the Cold War.  We won't forsake Canada.  We need your oil.  You need to sell us oil.  The customer is always right so STFU, please.  Just be grateful you have us as your neighbor.  We don't expect a thing from Canada except maybe a token force in our war to protect even Canada.  Oh, and your oil too.  Now, lets talk about the high price of oil at the U.S. gas pump.  It usually starts with high wholesale prices.  Wouldn't you agree?

You know what be interesting is your sources for civilians killed in War on Terror and which lies are directly related to deaths.  We could have several civilians related deaths directly related to the attack on NYC and several that are unconfirmed on the reason why, and several based on lies.  But even that would be impossible to count because the dead can't talk and they wouldn't know the difference anyway.  So, how many?  Exactly.  Seems Canada didn't have a problem with night area bombing entire cities during War War II.   The total civilian deaths for which in Europe alone exceeded both the A bombs dropped on Japan.   And I'm only referring to the British and Canadians bombing at night.  I'm not referring to the more dangerous precision daylight bombing the U.S. embraced.  When we finally took up night time bombing we killed a bunch of Canadians in the process.   Sorry about that.  Bombing at night is dangerous.  Sometimes the wrong people get killed.  The Americans thought it bad guys.  Sort of like you.  These turned out to be good Canadians shooting a improperly scheduled night time live fire excersise in a war zone.  Not exactly the coolest place to decide it is the time and place to practice shooting at night. But we are talking about Canadians here.  It was probably a budget thing.  No budget to practice at night in Canada but once in an active war zone the budget allows for real bullets that glow in the dark.  Sounds logical from a Canadian point of view to save money for national healthcare.  So, basically, I can stretch this even further and say these Canadians were killed to save money for social healthcare based on lies.  How many Canadians have died because social medicine doesn't budget for diagnosing treatable cancer in a timely manner?  It would take a mountain of lies to get this to work and it does work like this in social medicine.  I hope you don't get a toothache.   That would hurt for several days wait.

ArthurPE wrote:

[ 

n!&&erhead (perry is a gay conservative)

I'm not sure where you are getting your information from, but if it is a pay site, you need to demand your money back. Perry is a moderate NOT a Conservative.

booing a gay soldier who is on his 3rd tour and all the conservative candidates endorsed it by their silence

So your projecting blame onto Conservatives without any irrefutable proof. But you want us to believe your not a liberal. Nice try, no cigar.

killing x00,000 civilians in a war based on lies

Wrong. Based on the best information at the time. Furthermore, it was Saddam Hussein...you know, the dead Iraqi dictator that called America "The Great Satan"

The same Saddam Hussein that gased hundreds of thousands of the Kurdistan people. Good riddance and Congratulations to the United States military for a job well done.

or the 'christian right' lunatics protesting soldiers funerals...the soldiers are dead becasue god hates gays 

The Westboro Baptist Church is neither 'Baptist' nor is it 'Christian', it is a cult! If you would actually read the Bible, you would know that.  (Galatians 1:8-10) 

lol, you capitalize conservative like it deserves any more respect than liberal...

Ok. You want to project, We can do that. You use a lower case 'g' to spell God which is disrespectful to Christians. Of course, we know that most provinces in Canada has employed the 'religious tolerance act' making it illegal to preach certain Bible doctrines with the threat of jail time/fines. What a great, tolerant country Canada is.

all of the same ilk: bad for America

Aren't you glad that you live in Canada? I know that I am glad your living in Canada.

you live with blinders on

Oh sure, I can tell you are much, much more informed than I.

stop hating,

Hating?? Oh, you mean like using the term "n!&&erhead" as you did? Or calling people on the forum 'idiots' 'self-righteous prigs' like you did in your first post. Tell you what, look up the term 'hate' and while your at it, look up the term 'hypocrite.'  That may help you in allieviating any future hypocrisy on your part.

But we know that is not hate when it comes to you. its just, as you say, "how you get your point across."

With everybody else.....It's hate.

stop hating, it's like cancer, but instead of flesh it consumes your happiness...

yeah right, and I'm sure your fun at parties too.

It is interesting to see that the victims of the big lie pumped out by the allegedly conservative, actuall radical reactionary party, keep spewing the same old hatred of liberals, liberals, liberals that they've been spewing out for the last 20 years.

It is ironic, sad, but also catastrophic that the utterly insane  Republican party ( as opposed to the merely moronic Democrats) has stifled any hope of avoiding a second dip to the present depression with their idiotic rantings about "no more taxes", when it's tax cuts, coupled with their own removal of banking reguluations, that caused this depression.  This same republican party, that deliberately and willfully attempts to maximize misery in America, then spins the misery they create as the liberals fault.  Goebels would be proud of them, as would Pravda and whatever newspaper their government allows them to publish in Iran.

At this point, as much as most Democrats seem at least mildly moronic and unable to see beyond their own noses, the Republicans have engaged in an unprecented war on the working man, one that tops the ones waged by the steel, coal, and railroad barons of the past centuries, have ruined the life of the working man, and have used the misery they've created to bamboozle the working man into voting for them.

And, here, where we should see intellegent people having intellegent discussions, we see instead the same reflexive spewing of hatred and propaganda.

Everything you posted JJ is subjective.  As is the BIG LIE.  One thing that is not a lie is that Michael Moore will die an untimely death.  I suspect he will drop dead from a heart  attack.  That would be a BIG DEAL.  Ya think?

.

.

j_j wrote:

It is interesting to see that the victims of the big lie pumped out by the allegedly conservative, actuall radical reactionary party, keep spewing the same old hatred of liberals, liberals, liberals that they've been spewing out for the last 20 years.

 

Lies? Hatred?

But you give no examples. Why am I not suprised. Of course, when all you listen to is MSNBC's feminist commentator Rachel Maddow, and the self-admitted Socialist  Lawrence O'Donnell what do you expect?

 

It is ironic, sad, but also catastrophic that the utterly insane  Republican party ( as opposed to the merely moronic Democrats) has stifled any hope of avoiding a second dip to the present depression with their idiotic rantings about "no more taxes", when it's tax cuts, coupled with their own removal of banking reguluations, that caused this depression.

 

That's a bunch of left-wing B.S.

First of all, Stop blaming Bush. It's been 3 years and progressives like yourself fail to let Obama own ANY part of this economy.

Regulations? It was government regulations that caused the housing market collapse. The Community Re-investment Act of 1976, under democrat president Jimmy Carter, FORCED banks and lending institutions to secure loans for unqualified loan applicants thus resulting in the collapse.

Republicans John McCain and then president George Bush tried to warn of the insolvency of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae back in 2006, only to have Democrat committe chairs; Barney Frank and Chris Dodd to demonize McCain and Bush as fear-mongers. Then came the collapse proving Bush and McCain correct on the assessment of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

 Proof:

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/09/28/franks_fingerprints_are_all_over_the_financial_fiasco/

 

  This same republican party, that deliberately and willfully attempts to maximize misery in America, then spins the misery they create as the liberals fault. 

 

So it was the Republicans that increased the debt by 5 trillion in just 3 years?? More than all the Presidents combined since Washington.

No, that was your man Obama.

America is suffering but, the economy is great in Washington. Your man Obama is a record breaker. Read'em and weep:

Proof:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204479504576637513885592874.html

 

 

Goebels would be proud of them,

 

Goebbels would be proud of Democrat propagandists such as; Hillary Clinton, Rahm Emmanuel, Dick Durbin, that coined the phrase, "Never let a crisis go to waste."

You know, kinda like the Reischtag fire. So, genius, you were speaking of Goebbels...

 

 

At this point, as much as most Democrats seem at least mildly moronic and unable to see beyond their own noses, the Republicans have engaged in an unprecented war on the working man,

 

 

 Class Division 101. You seem to have overlooked the 'comprehensive list of Obama tax increases' posted in this section. Those massive taxes are passed on to the 'working man'

Progressive democrats don't give a shit about the working man, and haven't for the past 70 years. For the doubters, Obama etched that in granite with his massive tax increases on 'the working man.'

Which translates, under Obama, there are less 'working men' if you hadn't noticed with unemployment around 13% than there ever was under Bush.

GDP has been stagnant for 3 straight years. Unemployment has almost doubled, welfare roles are up 43%, and we lost our credit rating under your man Obama.

 

 

 

 

 one that tops the ones waged by the steel, coal, and railroad barons of the past centuries, have ruined the life of the working man, and have used the misery they've created to bamboozle the working man into voting for them.

 

 

 Yeah, how dare those evil, rotten businessmen/inventors for having the audacity to hire people to work so they too can earn a living.

Have you ever owned a business? Have you ever been responsible for anyone other than yourself? Have you ever had to make a payroll? Have you ever worked for a living? I doubt it.

These two men below also agree with you j_j on the evil, rotten Bourgeois (business owners) and their grip on the Proletariat (working man).

 

 

And, here, where we should see intellegent people having intellegent discussions,

 

"intellegent??

 Don't you think you should learn how to spell 'intelligent' before you start insinuating how 'unintelligent' people are? What's the matter, did they quit teaching English over there at Berkeley in favor of teaching Alinsky.

You can't handle an intelligent conversation. When asked to back up your claims, you just keep repeating the same thing over, and over again like a parrot, calling people liars and haters without giving any examples.

 

But its nice to see that you were able to break away from your student led anti-capitalism rally on campus for a moment to "educate" us.

 Cain is able. Your man Obama never was.

HERMAN CAIN 2012!!