Vote

Conrad-Johnson CVA50.

The only tube-based/hybrid products I have ever owned&#!51;Muscial Fidelity Tri-Vista SACD and Tri-Vista 300 inegrated amp—are in my system now. They sound wonderful. Did I hear any of the differences associated with tube vs transistor components? Sure, but they weren't nearly as distinct as is often made out in the audio press.

Humanity in the digital word! Tube preamp and DAC.

Magic sounding

I am too young to be from back in the day that tubes where the only choice, but my mono blocks, preamp and phono stage all have tubes. There was a time even my CD player had tubes, but I recently replaced this CD player with the p8i which graces Stereophile's most recent cover. I like the sound of tubes and it never tires me. I do have a solid-state backup power amplifier just in case a tube blows out.

In my guitar amp, tubes rule. But for stereos I've never heard a tube amp that was the equal of a transitor amp at all comparable in price.

every time I listen to tubed components, I feel the urge tp buy!!!

I have always thought that tubes have a truer presentation.

I Have a preamp with a tube. But when it came time to replace the tube and the original was no longer available, the "equivalent" substitute sounded brighter—not the sound quality that drew me to the preamp in the first place.

Go with triodes. Clean and harmonically rich.

CJ PV10A—it was nice.

Yes...wonderfull! A 45 SET; a 300B P-P, a preamp, and a tuner.

Love the sound, even with inexpensive tubes.

I tried an older Lafayette integrated amp that I recapped and replaced all the tubes. Sounded very musical and smooth! I have also tried a Dynaco preamp and experienced a similar smoothness and wonderful musical sound. I ended up selling them both. Sometimes I wish I still had them. There's not much solid-state gear that can compete!

It is called psychoacoustics. If you have a rolled-off treble, an uncontrolled, floppy bass, and all a component does right is the midrange—people tend to think "fantastic sweet midrange". It is a fallacy.

Have a tubed headphone amp. Sometime in the next year or so I am planning on selling my solid-state amp and preamp and buying an integrated tubed amp.

Mini component...Musical Fidelity X-Can V3 headphone amp ...sounds great with Sennheiser HD-600!

an Audio Research LS-2 preamp

Yes, I had tube gear... 30 years ago! Why anyone brags about old-fashioned vacuum tubes that get smoking hot, slowly die, burn out and need replacement, get microphonic, break because they're made of glass, and are obscenely expensive to replace every couple of years is beyond me.

I have and use an ARC-SP9 MkII and a pair of radically modified Dyna MK3s. The transformers and the output tubes are the only items remaining from the original MK3s. Long live the thermionic valve!

Bottlehead forever!

2A3 Amp 3.5 watts per channel!

Absolutely! Both my DAC and transport sit on inner tubes. It's hard to beat the airiness of tubes.

It was a very nice sounding preamp. Mated to a transistor power amp, it created a warm listening experience. Not very truthful, I'm afraid, but enjoyable. Maybe I should try it again some time.

My preamp and amps (for highs and mids) are tubed. I'd opt for a tubed DAC too but for the heat in summer. Now I swap the tubes for my SS integrated (otherwise bass) amp in the hot months. Running an air conditioner so that I can run tubes in the summer seems like environmental terrorism.

preamp and single ended amps

Musical Fidelity X-10 buffer.

Currently using a MF X-10V3 between and Alps po-based passive pre and my Class-D power amps. Works wonders. Recently had a tubed integrated but prefer my current setup.

Tubes still rule. If it was not for analog and tubes, I would not be reading this website. I would be watching a movie in the theater with all of the other lost audiophiles of yesteryear...

Just bought a hybrid tubed preamp. The sound is excellent.