j_j
j_j's picture
Offline
Last seen: 11 years 11 months ago
Joined: Mar 13 2009 - 4:22pm
A minor issue for Lamont and the deniers
Buddha
Buddha's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 years 6 months ago
Joined: Sep 8 2005 - 10:24am

Mother Jones, eh?

Fine, but then you can't criticize people who link to Fox News, etc.

What wine ya drinking tonight?

Lamont Sanford
Lamont Sanford's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 1 month ago
Joined: Mar 31 2006 - 8:32pm

Tee hee...

dbowker
dbowker's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: May 8 2007 - 6:37am

Yeah- come on, even for a moderately liberal guy ,like me, MJ is something I stopped reading soon after college. I was hoping for a link to something a little less... polarizing?

j_j
j_j's picture
Offline
Last seen: 11 years 11 months ago
Joined: Mar 13 2009 - 4:22pm


Quote:
Yeah- come on, even for a moderately liberal guy ,like me, MJ is something I stopped reading soon after college. I was hoping for a link to something a little less... polarizing?

Well, we see links to the other side all the time, and keep hearing the whole 'undecided' argument ...

Yeah, MJ can be a bit much. On the other hand, one has to wonder if the measurements are on the level...

Then again,

Quote:
Lead author Natalia Shakhova Shakhova of the International Arctic Research Center tells U of Alaska Fairbanks:

Got any scoop on this center? Maybe it's not suppored by Exxxon and ADM.

Elk
Elk's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 7 months ago
Joined: Dec 26 2006 - 6:32am

According to their web page, "the International Arctic Research Center (IARC) at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) was established in 1999 as a cooperative research institute supported by both the U.S. and Japanese governments. Funding comes from the National Science Foundation and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the U.S. and from the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency."

Home page

Lamont Sanford
Lamont Sanford's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 1 month ago
Joined: Mar 31 2006 - 8:32pm

http://hightimes.com/news/ht_admin/6053

But on a different note. The scientists that are currently gettting shoes thrown at them want to put a full page ad in the New York Times titled, "FUCKING BELIEVE IT!"

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/05/scientists-plot-to-hit-back-at-critics/


Quote:
In private e-mails obtained by The Washington Times, climate scientists at the National Academy of Sciences say they are tired of "being treated like political pawns" and need to fight back in kind. Their strategy includes forming a nonprofit group to organize researchers and use their donations to challenge critics by running a back-page ad in the New York Times.

Log in or register to post comments
-->
  • X