Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification | Digital Sources Analog Sources Featured | Accessories Music |
Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification Digital Sources | Analog Sources Accessories Featured | Music Columns Retired Columns | Show Reports | Features Latest News Community | Resources Subscriptions |
I don't like Avalons. They tend to have very sloppy bass and buzzing highs. I think there are much better speakers for that price on the market.
I liked the Avalon Evolution NP 2.0s but they did not take me to the place the Vandersteen 2Ce Signature IIs had which are less expensive. I'm sure if I had listened to them side by side the Vandersteens would have shamed them. I would think the Vandersteen 3A Signature would be a better value, but I have not heard the Avalon Symbol. If it needs a subwoofer for adequate low frequency extension, that right there would be a turn off for me.
I agree that the Vandersteens are better-sounding than those Avalons.
I had Vandersteen 2 speakers for several years, and then went to the Vandersteen 3A for more bass. Unfortunately, however, then I built a new house where my living room is 15 by 40 feet, and the 3A's do not have the bass capability for such a large room, so I had to add a pair of Vandersteen 2WQ subwoofers.
In my old house where the living room was 12 by 25, the 3A's had enough bass, but what I REALLY should have done was keep the Model 2's and added first one subwoofer at the old house and a second subwoofer when I moved; that would have bben cheaper...lol.