| Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
October 26, 2008 - 10:59am
#1
DSD vs standard PCM from Chief Engineer at Philips *DELETED*
| Loudspeakers Amplification Digital Sources | |
Analog Sources Accessories Featured | |
Music Columns Retired Columns | |
Show Reports | |
Features Latest News Community | |
Resources Subscriptions |
© 2024 StereophileAVTech Media Americas Inc., USA
All rights reserved
Very interesting. Do you have a link to the entire paper? I'd like to have a copy if possible.
ill see if I can find a link.. in the meantime, chew on these.
George Massenburg and Rupert Neve Interviews
http://www.prosoundweb.com/chat_psw/transcripts/george.shtml
http://www.prosoundweb.com/chat_psw/transcripts/rupert.php
.........................................................................................................
http://www.science.uva.nl/~robbert/zappa/interviews/Digital_Audio.html (zappa interview)
http://www.mtsu.edu/~nadam/downloads/SteveAlbiniweb.mov (steve albini lecture)
..............................................................................................................................................
The LouDness Wars..
Current Trends in Mastering: The Loudness War
http://www.soundmirror.com/articles.html#current
Frank Klemm's Clipping Page
http://www.personal.uni-jena.de/~pfk/MPP/clipping.html
Analysis - Dynamics
http://www.airwindows.com/analysis/Dynamics.html
The Big Squeeze -
Dynamics are Dead, Long Live Dynamics
Mastering Engineers Debate Music
Wow. That will definitely keep me chewing for a while.
The premise of this thread suggests that some are (still) arguing for SACD. I thought PCM/MLP (Meridian Lossless Packing), used on DVDA, was a more excepted "standard" than DSD/SACD. Is SACD making a "comeback"?
I like the theory that if SACD sounds better it, at least in part, is due to more careful production rather than the superiority of the media.
Scott, I didnt post with the intention of supporting DSD or any other format, I just did so because I thought that it was an interesting article.
I think it would be very cool to have a section of the stereophile forums devoted solely to reference material, white papers, and the ilk.
I agree.
Ethan posted this link on another thread: http://mixonline.com/recording/mixing/audio_emperors_new_sampling/index.html
It also talks about these differences. Its worth a read.
Can you provide dates for those quotes from BP?
Kal
workin on it, Kal. It was in 2005 sometime.. trying to tie it down..
in the meantime..
http://www.grimmaudio.com/whitepapers/dsd%20faq.pdf
another BP blurb
well hell, the forum polizei erased that paper, it was a good one. hope someone copied it.
I'm curious why this was deleted??? I read it and found (what parts of it I understood) to be interesting and in no way insulting or commercialized...
apparently I posted a complete unauthorized reprint? though In my very first post I mentioned that it wasnt complete.
I dont reckon things have to make sense, but it sure would be nice if they did.
I guess Kal got up in arms and asked someone to bolo my post..
We can't reprint entire documents without authorization or giving proper credit. Links should be provided instead.
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/928867-post21.html
Kal had nothing to do with it. I made the decision to delete your post which included many thousands of words of uncredited text. We can't do that here.
Thanks.
I don't see this addressed in the FAQ, so to prevent future "indiscretions" , you may want to lay out the proper SOP for reference material. If this has been done already, I would like to know where it is.
Thanks.
Nope. I just wanted a reference since it seemed a little dated.
Kal
My apologies.