Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification | Digital Sources Analog Sources Featured | Accessories Music |
Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification Digital Sources | Analog Sources Accessories Featured | Music Columns Retired Columns | Show Reports | Features Latest News Community | Resources Subscriptions |
Closing your eyes and painting a picture is soooo RETRO Man, where you around in the 60's man!!!! Peace, Love.....LSD was the paintbrush man..far out, groovey....Scuse me while I kiss this guy.....
Take it easy, Dorothy. Not everyone can be the girl friday for the magazine.
Actually the author sounds like something you would post if you took the time to do the math, except in readable English:
"In a recent issue of Stereophile they gave the average price of each type of component they have reviewed in the last couple of years. If you would put together a system from average-priced equipment it would cost about $30,000. You could buy a very nice car for this amount. This price does not include cables, stands, LP equipment or accessories. The average cost per component was $7667. If you eliminate a $350,000 amp from the average, the average goes down to $6204 per component. Probably less than one in a hundred thousand people can afford this type of system. For the price of some of the really highest end systems you could buy a nice house."
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the link. I read the article and I was less than overwhelmed. First of all, what Stereophile and other traditional print publications have that the Audiophile Audition and other online publications seem to lack is a good editor. There were quite a number of times in the article that I found myself scratching my head and saying "What?"
Examples:
If the dealer does not use tweaks then how did the buyer hear the tweaks?
DUP - you read this and didn't pounce, shame on you. This is just the kind of nonsense that turns people off to the high end. And just how do you use black thread to lift something? I believe you need more then just a piece of thread, perhaps a few sticks and some thread.
That was pretty much my impression with the article as well.
I think there are two obstacles that keep high end audio from becoming more appealing to the masses. The first and most important is the fact that people simply do not know what it is that they do not know. People are not being exposed to what a real audio system is capable of doing. There is little point in arguing what percentage of people would value what the high end has to offer if they never hear it done right in the first place.
The second obstacle is one of convenience. We have a generation of people who have been trained to value convenience, portability, flexibilty and good enough. Life moves faster and more efficiently than ever. Listening isn't a characteristic that the current generation is strongly suited for.
These aren't obstacles unique to the audio world; these are obstacles in just about every aspect of modern life. I still think there are millions of people who would place a high value on good quality sound if they were to ever hear it, but the percentage would still be relatively low.
"I don't want to be anywhere near a TV when listening to music."
I agree completely! I have my video setup way off to the side of my audio system and the two are not connected in any way. The audio system takes center stage in my room. I listen to TV audio through the built in speakers on my TV set. Quaint, I know. TV/Movie audio just doesn't matter that much to me and I must admit that I sometimes wince when I look at some of the user pics in the gallery and see a TV set between the speakers. But, hey, to each his own.