This invalidates the entire Recommended Components list.

Quote:
This invalidates the entire Recommended Components list.

Buddha,

I have two issues with the above statement. Both concern the usual insecurities of the average audiophile.

The first one is that if the erratum invalidates the entire Recommended Components list does that mean that the owners of equipment on that list now own a "NON" Recommended Component?

And the second issue is the converse of the first, which is, are all of those lone wolf audiophiles who have gone against the grain all these years and despite the odds overwhelming and constant peer pressure managed to assemble systems without using any Recommended Components, somehow vindicated?

What's next. Will a silly typo bring the great Super Disc List to it's knees or a misplaced catalog number bury the R2D4s? One can only hope Less dogma means more fun, but less places to throw stones.

That inappropriate apostrophe in "..it's knees..." invalidates your entire post.

Quote:
That inappropriate apostrophe in "..it's knees..." invalidates your entire post.

LMAO

Quote:
That inappropriate apostrophe in "..it's knees..." invalidates your entire post.

Damn. And I worked so hard, two. Oops, I means, too.

When can we expect the print version in our mailbox??? Your response will be greatly appreciated.

Quote:
When can we expect the print version in our mailbox??? Your response will be greatly appreciated.

Target publication date for any issue of Stereophile is the 15th of the preceding month. Thus you should both see the issue on the newsstand and receive it in your mail next week.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Haha! Your posts make me laugh/ cry!