|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters SSI 2009 CES 2009 RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Legend Audio Design Starlet integrated amplifier:
Legend states in its literature that the Starlet's measured performance will be worse than that of a "$100 RadioShack amplifier." This was certainly the case when I examined the amplifier's levels of distortion. The literature implies that the Starlet's higher-than-usual THD number was deliberate and "contributes to the perception of power." But when you look at fig.3, which shows the percentage of THD+noise plotted against frequency at 2.83V into a variety of loads, including a simulated loudspeaker, it is difficult, for me at least, to sympathize with this design approach. Levels of THD between 3% and 0.6% in the low frequencies may sound more "powerful"—I note that CS did find the Starlet's bass to have "realistic weight and presence"—but in my opinion, it's a trick. Fig.3 Legend Starlet, THD+noise (%) vs frequency at (from top to bottom at 4kHz): 4W into 2 ohms, 2.83V into simulated loudspeaker load, 2W into 4 ohms, and 1W into 8 ohms. Spectral analysis of a high-level, low-frequency tone (fig.4) reveals that the second harmonic is the highest in level, with then a regularly decreasing series of higher distortion harmonics. AC supply components can also be seen at 60Hz and its odd harmonics—the former actually lies at -50dB (0.3%), which is pretty poor engineering. (I tried all manner of grounding arrangements to reduce the level of hum, to no avail.) Higher in frequency and at lower signal levels, the distortion shifts in favor of the third harmonic (fig.5). But at high levels, the second again becomes predominant (fig.6). (Note also in this graph the AC-supply-induced sidebands around each of the signal's spectral components.) Fig.4 Legend Starlet, volume control at 2:00, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC-1kHz, at 14W into 8 ohms (linear frequency scale). Fig.5 Legend Starlet, 1kHz waveform at 2W into 8 ohms (top), distortion and noise waveform with fundamental notched out (bottom, not to scale). Fig.6 Legend Starlet, volume control at 2:00, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC-22kHz, at 14W into 8 ohms (linear frequency scale).
Article Continues: Measurements part 3 »
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





