|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes Dealer Locator AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Bryston 10B electronic crossover
"Crossovers? We don't need no stinkin' crossovers!" Most Stereophile readers probably feel this way when it comes to third-party electronic crossovers. In this day of proprietary "soup-to-nuts" speaker systems, nearly all manufacturers supply complete systems. Nevertheless, some brave (or foolish) souls still choose to sail in uncharted crossover waters. Most do so because they're insanely in love with their current speakers, and have an irrational desire for that last bottom octave. Others have "orphaned" speakers that are not readily upgradeable to the next level of performance. I fall into the second category.
While Apogee Full-Range speakers aren't exactly orphans—Apogee is very much in business, and still services their original Full-Range speakers (footnote 1)—they have no information in their files on the first passive crossover box that came with my set of Full-Ranges. Passive crossovers are fine, as long as you don't often change preamps and amps, since passive crossovers depend on the preamp's output impedance and the amp's input impedance being known and immutable quantities. Since I'm forever switching preamps and amps, a passive crossover can make an otherwise superb speaker sound rotten. Some of the preamp/amplifier combinations I've used with the passive crossover have moved the crossover point around, so the midrange ribbon was forced to do things it shouldn't. The result was a distressing display of quivering, flopping, and shivering during bass transients—not a pretty sight. Even if I were technically able to figure out which resistors needed changing every time I swapped a component, I'd still have better things to do with my time than soldering and unsoldering resistors onto the crossover's circuit boards. I've also got a thing for balanced interconnects; but after nine months of trying several harebrained and expensive methods of using two passive crossovers so I could use balanced lines, I gave up and decided to find a reasonably priced balanced crossover I could live with. The Bryston 10B answered my prayer.
Enter the Bryston
The Apogee Full-Ranges are uniquely problematic when it comes to crossover selection: Unlike 99.9% of other speakers, the Apogees need crossovers that relieve the midrange ribbon of most upper-bass responsibilities, while also providing midrange dynamic power by allowing the large panel woofers to extend into the midrange. The original passive crossover was ideally supposed to feature 6dB/octave slopes for both the high- and low-pass filters, with the crossover point set to 400Hz. After experimenting with several other combinations of slopes and crossover points, I ended up setting up the Bryston 10B with exactly these parameters. Who am I to argue with Leo Spiegel and Gary Walker, the speaker's designers?
Sound
Because of my previous experiences with passive vs active electronics, I was worried that the change from the Apogee passive crossover to the Bryston active crossover would include some trade-offs. Not only that, the Apogees' metal-ribbon drivers are very revealing of additional electronic or metallic edge; I was concerned that the solid-state Bryston would push the Apogees into hard steeliness. But after a few days of break-in, I was amazed at how little electronic signature the Bryston added. I began listening with a nasty recording—the Super-Bit-Mapped CD of Dylan's Blonde on Blonde (Columbia CK 53016). I figured if I could tolerate the "Leopard Skin Pill-Box Hat" test, the mellower stuff would be fine—nothing like some Michael Bloomfield Telecaster rear–pick-up action to scare Katy, my cat. She barely stopped purring. And instead of grabbing for my earplugs, I was tapping my feet and playing the air guitar. Damn, sounded like music—I detected no added glare, glaze, or hash. Next I played my favorite Jr. Wells/Buddy Guy recording, the Hoodoo Man Blues LP (Delmark DS-612). While listening to "Good Morning Little Schoolgirl" in anticipation of the Club Mondial jam session at the Las Vegas CES, I was again impressed with how little electronic haze the 10B added. Jack Myers' bass was especially well-reproduced, with excellent tone and impact. I then listened to a German vinyl copy of Eric Clapton's Unplugged. "Signe," including the "Are we ready?" interchange between Clapton and Andy Fairweather Low, was very nicely rendered. Even the foot taps exciting the mike stands were very clean, with good impact and definition. The left-of-center bells sounded very natural and were well-articulated without sounding hard. I could really get to like this sound. When active electronics are added to a system, I become concerned about what sort of subtractive colorations will be added (footnote 5). So I pulled out a PCM master tape of the Boulder Philharmonic performing Henri Wieniawski's (1835–80) Violin Concerto in d, Op.22, with soloist Anne Akiko Meyers. Through a combination of my beginner's luck and J. Gordon Holt's experience, we had managed to get an excellent recording of this violin showpiece using a Shure M/S mike and a Bryston BMP-2 mike preamplifier. This recording is very good at re-creating the dimensionality and dynamics of the Macky Auditorium performance. Compared with the Apogee crossover, the 10B hardly reduced the depth or dimensionality of the reproduced space. While there was a slight reduction in soundstage depth, it was only apparent in direct comparisons, and was more than compensated for by the Bryston's additional dynamic range. Dynamic contrast, bass extension, and speed were far superior through the Bryston than through the Apogee—the Apogee's bass reproduction seemed soft, slightly woolly, and underdamped. I noticed no additional electronic coloration when listening to commercial recordings, but with the master tape, my system sounded a bit more "electronic"—similar to the difference in sound between a new cable and one that's been broken-in for a few days. On the positive side, the Bryston didn't raise the system's level of background noise or increase the electronic grain. After more than four months with the 10B, I'm convinced that it's transparent enough not to obscure the difference between components upstream of it. While I wouldn't say the Bryston was sonically invisible, whenever I changed other components—cartridges, CD players, cables, amps, preamps—in my main system, the 10B never obscured the audibility of these changes.
Summary
The Bryston 10B is a versatile, ergonomically sophisticated crossover. It's an excellent compromise between absurd bells-and-whistles flexibility coupled with sonic degradation vs unusable perfectionist passive sonic minimalism. While the 10B's additions to and subtractions from the original signal weren't as transparent as those of the proverbial "straight wire with gain," they were minimal, and will be more than compensated for by the improvements it will effect in most systems. I give it a solid "B" rating.
Footnote 1: Last time I was at Apogee's Massachusetts factory, they were repairing a pair of Full-Ranges that someone had shipped from Germany. The shipping boxes alone cost more than most people's speakers. Footnote 2: The tested version also was a custom-configured version with the 250Hz marking actually being 600Hz. Footnote 3: To make room for a 10' Christmas tree, I moved the crossover closer to the preamp than to the amps, where it had been previously set up. Instead of running one 25' XLR line from the preamp to the crossover and two 1m XLR lines from the crossover to the amps, I ran a 1m XLR line from the preamp to the crossover and two 25' XLR lines from the crossover to the amps. Then, in order to eliminate the low-level hum, I tried every combination of floating and grounding between the preamp, crossover, and amps. The hum continued. Then I realized that the PAC IDOS floats the grounds of everything plugged into it. Everything was plugged into it. When I plugged both the Bryston and the amps directly into the wall without floating their grounds, the system was so silent I could hear a pin drop across the room. Ah, bliss... Footnote 4: It's always best to turn your amps off first. I've fried my share of gear by disregarding this sage advice. Footnote 5: Something of an oxymoron: detecting the presence of absence. Very Zen.
Article Continues: Specifications »
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

