|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes Dealer Locator AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Wadia Digital 830 CD player:
The Wadia's precision also seemed to result in instruments having truer, more natural timbres. The overall effect was a more vivid, captivating presentation. When I concentrated on an individual instrument, its components—attack, body, and decay—were obviously more distinct with the Wadia, as were the notes' fundamentals and individual harmonics. Voices and solo instruments, in particular, were wonderfully complex and rich with inner detail, as if I was hearing far deeper into the notes and voices than I had been before. Backing up a step, the Wadia seemed free of any obvious texture; its overall tonal balance was essentially neutral. On some program material, it seemed to have a little less weight in the lower midrange and midrange than some other players, or perhaps slightly diminished dynamic gradients relative to frequencies just above and below. Although the 830's perspective wasn't recessed, it didn't have quite as much bloom as the top-of-the-line California Audio Labs units, for example. The CALs have more midrange presence, albeit with a much more forward overall presentation, and nowhere near the 830's detail and precision. The 830's top end also seemed a little rolled-off compared to the very best extension I've heard. It's certainly very good, particularly when run straight into an amplifier, but the Mark Levinson No.39 sounded slightly more extended and airy than the 830, as did a Metronome/dCS Elgar combination I heard recently. On the other hand, the Wadia's dimensionality and handling of space was a half-step ahead of either the Elgar or Levinson, giving it a slightly more vivid presentation. Its temporal precision, too, struck me as being slightly better than the No.39's, and on a par with the Elgar's. Bottom Line If, on the other hand, you're like I was—convinced that one of the hot $1500 players is all you really want or need—I recommend that you steer clear of the Wadia 830. You might lose your grip on those convictions and find your world turned upside-down. The 830 isn't just better than the best midpriced players, or even lots better—it's fundamentally better. The difference will move your entire system a small but profound step closer to the real thing. The bottom line is that the Wadia 830 played a decisive role in another of my audio epiphanies; it's going to be hard, if not impossible, to give it up. The 830 does cost a bit more, but, as Charlie would tell me, the good stuff usually does.
Article Continues: Specifications »
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

