|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes Dealer Locator AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Vendetta Research SCP-2 phono preamplifier:
Thomas J. Norton compared the Vendetta with the Krell KRC's phono stage in March 1994 (Vol.17 No.3): I inserted the KRC preamplifier fitted with the Phono Module into the same system I discuss elsewhere in this issue—Apogee Mini-Grand loudspeakers bi-amped with two Krell KSA-300S power amps. The source was a VPI HW-19 Mk.IV turntable (not a recent sample) with an SME V tonearm (also an older sample) and a Lyra Clavis cartridge. With this review I had no truly familiar phono front end—a disadvantage. For a number of reasons, including malfunctions of a turntable and an arm, and the return of another arm—my long-term reference Graham—for updating, the VPI/SME/Clavis system was gathered together for this review. I was familiar with each of these items—arm, turntable, and cartridge—individually, but not in concert. There were only two things which marginally bothered me about the performance: the lightish balance and a tendency toward brightness with a small percentage of difficult program material. The latter may well have been exacerbated by the Clavis's overall balance combined with the Mini-Grands' tendency to be unforgiving in this region. However, the only way to be certain that these qualities weren't in the KRC Phono Module was to try a different phono stage. I planned such a comparison in any event, and to that end rounded up the Vendetta dedicated phono preamp with its line-level output. With the latter plugged into one of the KRC's line inputs, the games began. There were two objectives here: first, determine if the two characteristics I've noted were in the KRC Phono Module; second, compare the overall sound of our long-term reference Vendetta (the source of an ongoing custody battle between RH, JA, and me) with that of the Krell's own phono stage. The first thing I noticed was that while the Krell KRC Phono Module was very quiet at any normal listening level (no hum, and only a very slight rushing sound audible very close to the loudspeakers), the Vendetta was awesomely silent sans music playing, with noise totally inaudible at any distance from the loudspeakers. It was more like a line stage than a phono stage in this respect. The Krell was completely satisfactory, but the Vendetta was simply spooky in its lack of noise. Sonically, the Vendetta didn't substantially change the overall system balance—the sound was still a bit light rather than rich, but not unacceptably so. This was clearly not an inherent characteristic of the KRC Phono Module. With respect to the top end, the differences weren't profound, but did favor the Vendetta. The latter was a trace sweeter, though no less detailed, and was also marginally less up-front. The net result was a bit more delicacy and a more self-effacing character, with a more subtle rendition of ambience and inner detail. Some of the brightness noted remained—though no more than I've noted from the Mini-Grands elsewhere... If carefully matched with its associated components, the KRC Phono Module is capable of very fine performance. It shouldn't be surprising if the KRC Phono Module wasn't quite up to the Vendetta's level in a head-to-head matchup—before the Vendetta was (unfortunately) discontinued, it was five times more expensive than the Phono Module.—Thomas J. Norton
Article Continues: Measurements »
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

