|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes Dealer Locator AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
McCormack Power Drive DNA-1 power amplifier:
I'll close the listening impressions with a capsule comparison of the DNA-1 in relation to other superb amplifiers: the reference VTL 225W Deluxe monoblocks, Krell KSA-250, and the Boulder 500AE that so captivated J. Gordon Holt. First, the DNA-1 had tighter, deeper, faster, and better-defined bass than the VTLs. In the mids, the VTLs had greater lushness and ease, with unparalleled liquidity and harmonic rightness. It is this quality that makes the VTLs so special. The VTLs also threw a deeper soundstage, but the DNA-1 had a slight edge in keeping individual instrumental lines distinct from the whole. Both amplifiers were eminently involving and enjoyable. Significantly, I didn't feel compelled to immediately pull the DNA-1 from the system and get back to the VTLs. Even after the long-term auditioning was finished, I left the DNA-1 in place and continued to enjoy music through it. I usually feel an urgency to get back to my beloved VTLs after spending a month or more with solid-state amplifiers. Overall, I preferred the VTLs (especially when used in conjunction with the solid-state powered Muse Model 18 subwoofer), but the DNA-1 was not far behind. The DNA-1 was more like the Krell KSA-250 than the VTLs in bass performance. Both amplifiers had a satisfying punch and effortlessness, but the KSA-250 gets the nod. The DNA-1 also lacked the 250's ultimate soundstage depth, and generally had a more forward presentation. Significantly, the DNA-1 had many of the qualities that make the KSA-250 such a great amplifier. In relation to the Boulder 500AE, the DNA-1 was more laid-back and had a greater sense of ease. The 500AE, though, had a remarkable transparency, vividness, and clarity, qualities that reminded me of the Threshold S550/e. The Boulder had many appealing characteristics, but was a bit forward in relation to the DNA-1. Both amplifiers had superb bass; the nod goes to the DNA-1 for speed and articulation, but to the 500AE for a greater sense of weight and dynamic impact. Conclusion In comparing the DNA-1 to other solid-state power amplifiers, the one that comes immediately to mind is the $6250 Krell KSA-250. The two amplifiers have many things in common: fast and powerful bass, midrange liquidity, smooth and silky treble, and superb soundstaging. Ultimately I preferred the Krell, but not by as wide a margin as the difference in price might indicate. The DNA-1 is a strong Class B product that is knocking on the door of Class A performance. That's saying a lot for a $2000 amplifier, especially one with this power output and ability to deliver high current into low impedances. In short, the McCormack Power Drive DNA-1 amplifier is a real find, and a bargain at the price—a true high-end powerhouse amplifier that won't break your budget. If you're in the market for an amplifier anywhere near this price, I urge you to audition the DNA-1. If you don't, you'll never know what you're missing.
Article Continues: Specifications »
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

